Some women and numerous fashionistas seem to have declared war on leggings worn as pants.
Fashion icon Tim Gunn absolutely hates leggings and yoga pants.
There’s a YouTube video that has gone viral of Jamie Higdon Randolph (over) stressing that leggings are not pants and should not be worn as such.
The funniest anti-leggings screed though is the Australian group “Skit Box” song about “Active Wear” which is basically a sporty-style of leggings.
On the other hand, we single males love leggings (I mention single because married men aren’t allowed to like them without the wife’s permission). They are skin-tight, make us imagine the woman as naked although clearly clothed, and even though leggings help hide some sins, for the most part they allow us guys to see what the legs are shaped like. As a “leg man” I think they’re hot.
Unfortunately, as discussed previously, women don't dress for men. They dress for other women. So although there might be a tendency for some women to say that they are doing it to get a man’s attention, that's not the reality.
So why do women risk the social media condemnations and askance stares of other women to wear leggings? Apparently, they have multiple reasons:
Many will say they wear them for comfort.
Some declare they do it because the leggings give them a feeling of empowerment and physicality because they are so often used for exercise and hearty activities.
They don’t want to mess up their “good” clothes when doing chores or errands.
A few really brave souls will admit they are doing it because they are too lazy to try to pick out something else (the male equivalent to wearing sweat pants).
As stated earlier, we single guys love leggings. So as far as this yearly battle (it surfaces every time fall rolls around) on whether women should wear leggings as pants, let me just conclude by saying “Please, keep it up.”
(Some angry feminists who heard that I was going to blog about leggings said I was only doing it so I could post more pictures of women in tight clothing and not to make social commentary. Um, maybe.)